Is NANO on path to transform digital cash, the same way as email did, back in the 90's? Does the "lack of incentive to run a nano node" debate still makes sense when 1 nano trx burns 2 million x less energy than its BTC equivalent ?

I'm really curious about your point of view. Price related comments not welcome (tired of this).When I see how cheap and simple it is to run a nano node, I completely reevaluate the perspective of achieving organic and long lasting decentralization based on the most simple hardwares; The level of interest/incentive needed in the ecosystem can be as little as holding a few bucks or running a business interacting with the payment system. The ratio "incentive to run a node / cost to run a node" could even exceeds the viability of the BTC equivalent ratio, this later being based on competition, concentration in pools and obsolescence of hardwares (not considering huge pollution and waste of energy).I see Nano nodes evolving the same as free email providers do, when offering "free email service". The consequence of this design is the need launch a dynamic anti-spam system, and nano seems to have it. P2PoW allows even anyone to collaborate in this solution, without even the need for running a node, especially since it is all about preventive "micro-Pow" infinitely smaller than BTC Pow. https://ift.tt/2L4pM7u there any better example for the "email of money", in the crypto landscape? For this, it must at least offer feeless and instant transaction; these are necessary conditions

Submitted December 30, 2020 at 10:57PM