https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/t0q8kn/evidence_that_charles_was_involved_in/https://twitter.com/IOHK_Charles/status/1497296939091566593His post:This is a follow-up to https://ift.tt/gh6st0S that post, I gave a list of about 150 addresses that connected IOHK's wallet to the billion ADA unstaked wallet involved in the SundaeSwap front-running. Naturally, I was accused of FUD, saying that I made it up and that there was no way someone could track that accurately.Here's a much shorter path connecting the two wallets.📷Starting from IOHK's address https://ift.tt/Wo1UYQR, it takes less than 15 steps to go from that wallet to the billion ADA unstaked wallet associated with the SundaeSwap front-running.You can see in the left column the outgoing address along the path, and in the right column, you see the amount of one of the transactions from the prior address to that address. The right column only gives one transaction amount even when there may be others, since it's only looking at the first page of transactions when going to the transactions page. If there were dozens of transactions outgoing to that address, then the right column only is reporting one of them listed on the first page of transactions. You can see that all but one transaction is on the order of hundreds of millions or billions of ADA. This is not IOHK paying an employee (unless employees are being paid hundreds of millions of ADA!).To follow along with how to read the table, first go to IOHK's original wallet https://ift.tt/Wo1UYQR. Then find the first outgoing address in the table above and click that link to go to the transactions for that address.So click on: https://ift.tt/75IPmzZ go to the next outgoing address in the table: https://ift.tt/If0tcOi go to the next outgoing address in the table: https://ift.tt/rDiWReS rest of the sequence is given below for you to verify yourself:https://ift.tt/8FWRGsl don't need to question whether I made up these transactions or manipulated the Cardano blockchain in some way. These records are immutable and they are available for you to verify, so go verify. I will probably be accused of being a paranoid schizophrenic again, and maybe I am, but who cares! The point of blockchain is that you don't need to trust me or anyone else. I know some of you reading this will instinctively be defensive and lash out with insults, but I dare you to verify the transactions yourself before downvoting.Edit: Thanks for taking up the challenge and looking into this. Some of you found that there was only a 10 ADA transaction between two of the addresses. That's because both output addresses (one with 10 ADA and the other with 241 million ADA) are tied to the same wallet. It's not obvious, but you can read more here https://ift.tt/zuf5DWY TLDR form of that comment is: the wallet address ending in bs1Wq and wallet address ending in oQU1E are part of the same wallet. You can tell this since they are both outputs of TxHash 547f47b146464476c2da4184fa9123d147053b2e5c84d1f0ede1479a12afbd97, and then one is the input (oQU1E) while the other (bs1Wq) is the output of the next transaction of the bs1Wq address, with TxHash d632d8f487f156c2c91a46e15b066a22888aa2f71ed61bd2d33dd61f46b9590c. That indicates that these two addresses are linked and that the second transaction is a reshuffling of ADA between addresses of the same wallet.Even if you aren't convinced that they are part of the same wallet, then suppose they're separate, independent addresses. Then that only adds one more address on the path connecting IOHK's wallet to the billion ADA unstaked wallet:https://ift.tt/76cwGHX volume from Tf4YT to oQU1E would be 241M. The volume from oQU1E to bs1Wq would be 25M.TLDR: Don't try to hard to make some transaction history a proof of something that is not.Guy had too much time and wanted CH to be a bad guy.Don't upvote this post too much, because the whole trilogy is a waste of crypto jurnalism. If you have time tho, go to the 2nd part and downvote the moonfarmer. Fake proof should not deserve moons IMO.
Submitted February 26, 2022 at 03:57AM
No comments:
Post a Comment